Maggie and Julia – A Tale of Two Sisters


julia Gillard cartoon


The Iron Lady and her Australian counterpart Julia Gillard have a quite a few things in common: both had the extraordinary distinction of being first woman in the top job; one has died recently and the other is in the death throes of a failed government. Both are strident and loud speakers with unpleasantly harsh voices, although Thatcher was groomed more effectively to soften hers, which – for many – made her harsh and uncompromising policies even harder to stomach. Both are extremely strong and resolute people in the face of vitriolic condemnation and opprobrium, and both apparently have considerable personal charm, not always apparent from their public personae.

And both have stirred a level of animus verging on hatred, which is personal as well as political. Gillard has called it misogyny, and will be best remembered for her remarkable and passionate outburst against Opposition Leader Tony Abbott that went around the world and has landed her on the shortlist for Time Magazine’s One Hundred Most Influential people of 2013. And there is no doubt that much of the criticism leveled against her is couched in terms that wouldn’t be used for a male. Germaine Greer of all people is remembered, not for her measured assessment of Gillard’s ability but for her fashion advice (!) Ditch the jackuts, Julia. They just don’t suit you. Fuelled by some audience sniggers she went on to screech unforgivably: Face it Julia, you’ve got a fat arse! It was a low moment in Australian public life and Gillard to her credit has always answered her detractors in much more moderate language.

Thatcher was and still is the target of deep hatreds and resentments because of her hard line policies on the economy and the unions. She remains a divisive figure. Some credit her with bringing Britain into its new incarnation as a free market mover and shaker with the money-managing temples of Canary Wharf at its hub. Others blame her for the woeful decline in industrial Britain and the breaking of social contracts for fair work conditions and public housing. But love her or hate her, no one denies the successful execution of her desired outcomes, and her gender was never the issue.

There are still deep cultural issues to be explored about the way we feel about the females who take on the traditionally male leadership in first world countries but Margaret Thatcher, and Angela Merkel for that matter seem to transcend the gender divide and are admired or despised for their abilities and their policies, not the size of their arses!

There is no doubt that Julia Gillard has been subjected to some disgusting personal invective, not least of which was a slur on her recently deceased and much-loved father. But the opinion polls show that Australians overwhelmingly condemn such unseemly and indecent behaviour. Even though a landslide victory is predicted, Tony Abbot’s personal stocks are still well down. People don’t like him, but they will vote him in, not because he’s a male but because Gillard has fatally mismanaged her role as the first female prime minister of Australia.

To begin with, her entitlement to the job is tainted. Kevin Rudd, for all his failings, was the elected leader, was in the middle of his first term and should have been left to stand or fall on his own record. I’m sure Gillard was well enough educated, but she clearly didn’t read Richard 11: Not all the waters of the rough rude sea can wash the balm from an anointed king. (111:ii: 55-56). Rudd wasn’t thrown from the top of Pomfret Castle, he was merely deposed, but he will haunt Julia for the rest of her life just as Richard haunted the usurper Bolingbroke.

She was poorly advised then and continues to be, and for all her ability, personal charm, feistiness and adamantine strength, she will fail, because – unlike Margaret Thatcher – the lady is for turning. She chops and changes between the “Real Julia” and the manufactured Julia who feels she needs to respond to so many interest groups she ends up pleasing no one. To be fair, she is a victim of the twenty-four hour news cycle, but I cannot imagine Margaret Thatcher being cowed by the latest twitter feed. Thatcher was, as many have said, a conviction not a consensus politician, but Julia Gillard has become neither. She cannot achieve consensus in her own party, never mind across the political divide, and her convictions – strong as they are about a fairer society, have been drowned in the swamp of political mismanagement.

Margaret Thatcher was loved or despised for herself and her convictions because success trumps gender. But failure doesn’t! And like it or not, our first female prime minister carried with her a wider set of dreams and hopes into office than just the political. On September 14th more will be lost than just an election.

Cartoon reproduced with thanks to  cartoon by Nicholson from The Australian newspaper


12 thoughts on “Maggie and Julia – A Tale of Two Sisters

  1. Oh Angie, how I have missed you and missed teaching with you. I hope you and Bob are having a gorgeous time in your retirement. I love your first “official” entry, especially the Shakespearean analogy. In Melbourne on the day of the failed leadership challenge we had wild weather, so for me, Gillard will always be Lady Macbeth. The political form of regicide will haunt her and it seems the horses will continue to ‘eat themselves’ as the rightful order was not returned. Thank you for sharing, I look forward to reading more. Let me know if you visit Melbourne
    Renae Bishop

  2. My first reply! I wasn’t sure the acceptance of your comment had gone through…still getting my head around the logistics, but thank you so much for taking the time. And you are right, it is all unfolding like a Shakespearean tragedy and I’m sure that come September the stage will be littered with bodies. I find the whole thing very upsetting, because we’re all looking for leadership, not political infighting. On a happier note, I love seeing the photos of your lovely Melbourne life and family and will definitely drop in for a cuppa on our next visit!

  3. Hi Angie,
    Really enjoyed reading your thoughts on the role of first female PMs at this very apt moment in history! (Just realised my abbreviation of Prime Ministers reads like Pre Menstrual Syndrome – that certainly trivialises the gender debate) I enjoyed your allusion to Richard II. Popular opinion would suggest that Aussies don’t like back-stabbers but clearly this disgust is far more universal. Thank you!

  4. Well staid Angie. Thrilled to be able to read such insightful analysis with plenty of wit yet without the “hyper bowl”. Waiting with baited breath for the next instalment – on your blog as well as in the Australian political tragedy.
    Well done
    Liz x

      • Hi Liz…thanks so much for the words of encouragement, and for the inspiration for my next post. I tooo habe an issue with fat fingers. Watch this space.

  5. Very interesting blog post, Angie. Problem was, with Thatcher, that she represented the non-gender or gender-blind – yes, folks forgot she was a woman (good in many ways) and concentrated on her politics, but sadly she did absolutely zilch for other women (position, role, advancement, etc) and at the time we thought she was actually very sexist, even mysoginist (is that spelled right?). Those of us fighting for gender equality were disappointed at the lost opportunity. Rather a case of : I’ve got there but I don’t want any other woman to invade my pitch!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s